Quote
Hello John, The words i used are a hypothesis of mine derived from what Jung says. He doesn't talk about a dynamic function to multiply symbols, but the division seems to be performing this task. It's not easy going. A mind divided against itself can become neurotic, painful, and all the rest of it. But it's the price that is paid for the acceleration of symbols. I think this supports those who find it supports them. I don't know why i have to tippy toe around like a criminal, but i'm thinking that if i am tacit i won't fill up my quota. Comment , Adrie. i dont know why i have to tippy toe around....etc, you are blowing your cover , the obsession is taking the lead again Bodrus.; get medical attention. 2010/9/4 <[email protected]> > > Ade, > > This reminded me of some reading I'm doing of Peirce's thinking: > > > > Hello ? > > All humas are symbolic animals. > > Those which developed a division between their psychic nature and > > non-psychic nature had a dynamic function to multiply symbols. > > > > > > This process developed in the East also but it lacked the dynamic > function. > > > > > > So the trouble lies in the dynamic function. That is to say, it isn't a > > trouble at all. > > > > > *http://www.cspeirce.com/menu/library/aboutcsp/auspitz/escape.htm > > To repeat: Peirce's motive in providing explicitly for the free, forward > play of mind was to give prominence to hypothesis in scientific discovery. > Instead of stifling the bold, speculative leap, Peirce wished to find ways > to encourage and discipline it. He did so out of a faith in the human > capacity to guess correctly. As he saw it, the progress of science > testified > to a reality present in both the human mind and the order of the universe. > Science did not proceed merely in small inductive increments but in > imaginative theorizing in which our use of signs in their general aspects > enabled us to participate in a natural order that was itself evolving > toward > greater generality. > > Sounds like Quality thinking to me! > > John > > > Hello John, > The words i used are a hypothesis of mine derived from what Jung says. > He doesn't talk about a dynamic function to multiply symbols, but the > division seems to be performing this task. > It's not easy going. A mind divided against itself can become neurotic, > painful, and all the rest of it. But it's the price that is paid for the > acceleration of symbols. > I think this supports those who find it supports them. > I don't know why i have to tippy toe around like a criminal, but i'm > thinking that if i am tacit i won't fill up my quota. > > > Maybe we could use the word custard as a symbol for what can't be mentioned > more than twice daily. > > > I think Jung supports custard and when i realised this i felt better > because i had real problems with custard until then. > It's a great feeling when that happens and i hope custard feels good also. > > > Regarding Peirce, i am not very familiar with the precise details of his > ideas. I've come into contact with them because they are widely used by > those who write about culture. > I'll try and read what you've recommended. > So many recommendations. It's hard to keep up. > > > Hope to continue with this. > Thank you > Ade > > > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- parser Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
