Hi Mary
On 2010-09-04 16:35, Mary wrote:
Hi Magnus,
1. There's a big leap from valuing a division to suggesting it's a
whole new level. Especially since it demotes *any* written text to just
inorganic ink, and the human brain to mere biology.
If this is a summarization of SOM, it is an incorrect one. I'm not aware of
anyone who asserts anything remotely like this. If this is what you think
it is, then I understand why you oppose it.
I was talking about SOL, not SOM. And Bo has claimed both. Let me know
if you want references, I'm pretty certain I can find at least the latter.
2. Since you understood the stack concept, you should realize that the
S/O division only has value, actually only is real at all, in the human
perspective stack. The S/O division is not transposable to any other
stack, so it has little metaphysical value.
Many assertions of the MoQ are not directly transposable to any other stack.
Does that mean the MoQ has little metaphysical value?
Hmm... not sure about that one. I'd actually like to think that any
assertion about the MoQ *is* transposable to any other level. However,
many instances of such MoQ assertions inside a stack may not be
transposable.
And in the case of the SOL, since it's not transposable, in fact, it
states itself that it's only valid within the human perspective, it's
therefore such an instance of a supposed MoQ assertion, but since it's
not transposable, it can't be a general MoQ statement. That may be a tad
too many logical steps at once, but I'm tired, been a long day.
Magnus
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
