On Sep 13, 2010, at 12:02 PM, david buchanan wrote: > > Marsha said to Horse: > > Having been on the receiving end of one of dmb's trashy little posts full of > insults, I was a bit sensitive to the tactic. But I get your message loud > and clear. It won't happen again on my part. > > > dmb says: > > If my purpose were merely to insult, the so-called "tactic" of sending a > private message to one person rather than to the whole group would be > counterproductive in the extreme. If my purpose were merely to shame or > bully, it would be far more effective to do the insulting in front of as many > people as possible. That's why politicians put their attack ads on TV - at > great expense. And that's why you "needed" to take my private post and make > it public. Somehow, by your calculations, you imagined this would embarrass > me. It doesn't. But if I were John, I wouldn't be too happy about it. You > dished up the embarrassment that I was trying to spare him. > > I think this little episode says a whole lot about where you're at, Marsha. > This behavior only shows that your heart is full of vengeance and spite. The > reason is obvious; I'm very critical of your position on the MOQ and of your > evasive style and you don't like it. Rather than respond to the actual > criticisms, you'll just do sleazy stuff like this. Dropping the "F" bomb, > playing the (mixed-up) tattle-tale and declaring your intellectual autonomy > and your intention to ignore me are just more of the same. Altogether, it's > just one big temper tantrum. I doubt that anyone is going to take you or your > position more seriously because of it.
Marsha says: I don't think you can speak for ALL anything, and personally having read what you wrote think it says volumes about you. I don't like to discuss issues with you because of your propensity to fall into the name-calling mode when you don't get agreement. But I've had enough. You may continue this thread without me, because I am going back to refusing to participate in a discussion with you. I wish you well, of course. > > > > >> >> On Sep 13, 2010, at 10:42 AM, Horse wrote: >> >>> [Message from MD Administrator] >>> >>> I agree completely with Adrie here. >>> Emails that are sent off-list should remain off-list. >>> If they are to be posted to the list then ALL participants should agree to >>> their being published on MD AND they should run it past me first. >>> If there is some particular reason that you feel something should be be >>> brought from the private to the public domain (threats or whatever) then >>> please contact me with your concerns. >>> >>> >>> Horse >>> >>> >>>>> And i strongly dissaprove the usage for unclear purposes of list-ommitted >>>>> mails. >>>>> Mails that are meant to be kept confidential, have no right of existence >>>>> in >>>>> the public domain.This is unnaceptable. >>>>> >>>>> I'v stayed away from the conflict DMB, Jc,i try to keep my options open as >>>>> long as possible.try to settle the conflict Jc, without cheap >>>>> use of relaying mails in the public domain. >>>>> >>>>> Adrie > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
