On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:44 PM, <platthol...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 16 Sep 2010 at 17:18, Steven Peterson wrote:
>
> Hi Platt,
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 3:36 PM,  <platthol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Ham,
> >
> > Yes, "Something from Nothing" is latest iteration of the "Oops Theory" of
> how
> > the universe came into being. It goes hand in hand with the terms
> "spontaneous"
> > and "emergence" so favored by science types when they have no idea why or
> how
> > something occurred.
>
>
> It would seem that either at some point something came from nothing or
> that something was always around. Which do you think it is?
>
> Hi Steven,
>
> I suppose you can argue that nothing is something. But, that doesn't sit
> well
> with me because to have a concept of nothing you have to have something,
> just
> as the concept of a whole presupposes a larger whole, or the concept of one
> presupposes the concept of many. So we find ourselves in the land of
> paradox.
>


If concepts are real (something) and nothing is indusputably conceptual,
then nothing is indisputiably something.

 Platt:

The only way out of this rational cul-de-sac that I know of is for one to
> decide which underlying assumption of the many available has the highest
> quality. For me, it's  that something was always around. In other words, I
> buy
> the scientist's assumption that for every effect there is a cause That at
> the
> beginning of the universe cause and effect suddenly becomes inoperative to
> Hawkins and some other cosmologists seems to me to be a grand cop out.
>
>
John:  Yes, given a pick between cosmologies, what 'good" is a nihilistic
one?





> But I could be wrong. Maybe the technique Magnus uses to identify underling
> assumptions will reveal that I am. :-)
>


Well, you'll get no argument from me, I agree completely.

Idealistically yours,

John
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to