Adrie,
And one served back by Night...
----
THE BRIDGE
by Octavio Paz
Between now and now,
between I am and you are,
the word bridge.
Entering it
you enter yourself:
the world connects
and closes like a ring.
>From one bank to another,
there is always
a body stretched:
a rainbow.
I'll sleep between its arches.
----
Thanks.
Marsha
On Sep 19, 2010, at 11:02 AM, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote:
> Yes you are reading, the light of hope at the horizon, i'l throw in a
> goodie, a polished apple.
>
>
> LOST IN THE FOREST
>
> Pablo Neruda.
>
> Lost in the forest, I broke off a dark twig
> and lifted its whisper to my thirsty lips:
> maybe it was the voice of the rain crying,
> a cracked bell, or a torn heart.
>
> Something from far off it seemed
> deep and secret to me, hidden by the earth,
> a shout muffled by huge autumns,
> by the moist half-open darkness of the leaves.
>
> Wakening from the dreaming forest there, the hazel-sprig
> sang under my tongue, its drifting fragrance
> climbed up through my conscious mind
>
> as if suddenly the roots I had left behind
> cried out to me, the land I had lost with my childhood--
> and I stopped, wounded by the wandering scent.
>
> 2010/9/19 MarshaV <[email protected]>
>
>> Dave,
>>
>> If you read 'reifying carrots' thread, most of my examples
>> of reification come from a Buddhist perspective. I think this
>> is quite appropriate when one considers the MoQ may
>> be considered a bridge between Western Science and
>> Eastern Insight.
>>
>> Wikipedia is not the sole source of information. There are
>> also many books available, and I read.
>>
>>
>> Marsha
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 19, 2010, at 10:46 AM, David Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/18/10 11:57 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Reification is represents my reasoning for labeling intellectual static
>>>> patterns of value a product of subject/object thinking. The 'reifying
>>>> carrots' thread I have presented many examples, primarily Buddhist, but
>> also
>>>> others, explaining the process. Here is one such example:
>>>
>>> In linguistics
>>> Main article: Abstraction (linguistics)
>>> Reification, also called hypostatization, might be considered a formal
>>> fallacy whenever an abstract concept, such as "society" or "technology"
>> is
>>> treated as if it were a concrete object. In linguistics this is called
>>> metonymy, in which abstract concepts are referred to using the same sorts
>> of
>>> nouns that signify concrete objects. Metonymy is an aspect of the English
>>> language and of other languages. It can blur the distinction between
>>> abstract and concrete things:
>>> 1805: Horatio Nelson (Battle of Trafalgar) - "England expects that every
>> man
>>> will do his duty"
>>> [wikipedia]
>>>
>>> I guess basing one's general understanding of reality on a formal fallacy
>>> does have a certain boldness about it.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
>
>
>
> --
> parser
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
___
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
