On Sep 21, 2010, at 7:05 AM, Andre Broersen wrote: > Marsha to Andre: > > Oh right, Poincare says and the world freezes with his statements. That's as > bad as "James and > Pirsig say", "James and Pirsig say", "James and Pirsig say"... Boring... > I have the concept of > 'intelligence' as separate from intellect/intellectual. > > Intelligence: The skillful use of whatever patterns (organic, biological, > social& intellectual) a > given situation requires, or possibly to use no patterns if nothing is > required. > > I find no decisive definition of intellectual static patters of value in this > annotation. If you want > to jump to a conclusion by all means do so, but don't expect that I am going > to make the same > jump. > > I'd say 'intelligence' includes insights, intuitions and expanded > consciousness, but again, I have > intelligence defined separately from intellect/intellectual. > > Have a nice day. > > Andre: > You know, you are really funny. Your responses remind me of something > Northrop observed as well. > In America it seems that since individuals count, their ideas count as well, > in the sense that they > should all be given equal validity and status, that they are all of high > intellectual quality.
My ideas count for me at the moment. I admit I may be wrong about everything, but I'm trying things out, trying to think them through. Doing the best I can. But your interpretations are just your ideas about what other may mean. You act as if you are mind-reading RMP, and you are not. You are interpreting. And this post has nothing to say. It's only lobbing insults. Which I remember from your treatment of Bo, seems the extent of your capabilities. Since dmb's last words to me were calling me an asshole, let me project my judgement onto him. It is near impossible to agree or disagree with what dmb thinks, since he seems to have not learned that skill yet. Or maybe he so terrified of being backed into a paradoxical corner he is too frightened to create his how explanation. So he spits out some appropriate and inappropriate RMP quotes and says there's my contribution, then calls you an "asshole" when you don't swoon at his intelligence. I may be wrong, but at least I try to think beyond the words on a page. "James and Pirsig say", "James and Pirsig say", "James and Pirsig say"... Boring... And if I suggest that there may be many philosophical truths, he argues against that too. I doesn't apply in his case. > Thus Marsha's ideas on the theory of relativity weigh equally as high as > those of Einstein. > Marsha's ideas on the MOQ weigh equally as high as those of Mr.Pirsig. > Marsha's ideas on radical empiricism weigh equally as high as those of > William James. > Marsha's ideas on mathematics weigh equally as high as those of Poincare. > > I know you have a problem with authority mate (and rightly so sometimes), but > this is ridiculous. "Nullis in verba" > Dmb was right about you...and me too. > > Goodbye Marsha. Goodbye Andre. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
