Greetzz, Andre,. Well of course i was reading this, and i strongly suspect that you are also pointing out towards a sort of fictional reality i your thinking , pff, in the end Andre, it serves no purpose to proceed , i think its a better path to trust on the evidence , The field of material that is availiable, loads of unseen quality that is still embedded in the words , the patterns, the value's.
I was reading her aqusations about your bad behaviour to Bo, y i see it , it was also Andre investing most of his time to make Bo understand things he was not capable of understanding. DMB is showing an incredible capacity to open the toolbox with scientifical force , to display wat remains unseen. All evidence is showing that he can do it without contaminating laws of nature, intellectual property,common sense,... Most philosophers are softie's , vegetable's, like say kiwi's or banana's or tomatoes,....tomatoes mostly i think, But this one is no tomato, this one will fight for the gold. Quality. I strongly suggest to deviate our attention.., Your's, Arlo's , etc, (non-limiting) to his efforts and abstractions. I see no further use to team up with people how are showing only to be deconstructive. there is a field ahead of us, filled with good material,-away from fictional reality. Thx for your interventions , Andre. 2010/9/21 Andre Broersen <[email protected]> > Marsha to Andre: > > > Oh right, Poincare says and the world freezes with his statements. That's > as bad as "James and > Pirsig say", "James and Pirsig say", "James and Pirsig say"... > Boring... I have the concept of > 'intelligence' as separate from intellect/intellectual. > > Intelligence: The skillful use of whatever patterns (organic, biological, > social& intellectual) a > given situation requires, or possibly to use no patterns if nothing is > required. > > I find no decisive definition of intellectual static patters of value in > this annotation. If you want > to jump to a conclusion by all means do so, but don't expect that I am > going to make the same > jump. > > I'd say 'intelligence' includes insights, intuitions and expanded > consciousness, but again, I have > intelligence defined separately from intellect/intellectual. > > Have a nice day. > > Andre: > You know, you are really funny. Your responses remind me of something > Northrop observed as well. > In America it seems that since individuals count, their ideas count as > well, in the sense that they > should all be given equal validity and status, that they are all of high > intellectual quality. > > Thus Marsha's ideas on the theory of relativity weigh equally as high as > those of Einstein. > Marsha's ideas on the MOQ weigh equally as high as those of Mr.Pirsig. > Marsha's ideas on radical empiricism weigh equally as high as those of > William James. > Marsha's ideas on mathematics weigh equally as high as those of Poincare. > > I know you have a problem with authority mate (and rightly so sometimes), > but this is ridiculous. > > Dmb was right about you...and me too. > > Goodbye Marsha. > > This is an electronic mail message. We request you not to reply to this > automatically generated message. > > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- parser Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
