Hello again Tim, On Nov 7, 2010, at 8:36 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Marsha, > a quick comment or three below, > Tim > > > On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 03:44:17 -0400, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> said: >> >> Greetings Tim, >> >> I have no objection to the conventional use of 'self' and objects.' >> These >> patterns have evolved because of their usefulness, but their independence >> is an illusion. > > Tim: > Is their interdependence an illusion? Marsha: If you think that interdependence exist independently than I suppose it is an illusion. >> My definition of intelligence is not confined to the intellectual level, >> but is >> the skillful use of whichever appropriate patterns (organic, biological, >> social >> & intellectual) a given situation requires, > > Tim: > requires... requires for what? Marsha: Required in the moment. But that has already gone by. Too late... >> or possibly to use no >> patterns >> if something dynamic is required. >> >> I also believe there is a knowledge that comes from direct experience >> (insight) >> that is beyond word-bound. > > Tim: > I only wonder whether I need a different word from knowledge. I know > Phaedrus said, you know quality... I think I lean more to a verb form > of faith. Marsha: I suppose that depends if you mean faith or FAITH. Quality(unpatterned experience/patterned experience), what requires faith? ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
