On 10/4/10 3:13 PM, "David Buchanan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> dmb says: > > Ever-changing static patterns? You might see Quality from an > unpatterned/patterned point of view? > > Isn't it true that static means stable, which is approximately the opposite of > ever-changing? > > Isn't it true that the MOQ's first conceptual distinction is between dynamic > (unpatterned) and static (patterned)? > > So the phrase "ever-changing static patterns" undermines the MOQ first > distinction. Like the phrases "fluid rigidity" or "stable flux", it's > nonsense. Just ask Susanna. She knows it rained all night the day I left, the > weather it was dry. The sun was so hot I nearly froze to death, Susanna don't > you cry. As Marsha might respond: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbfbVMpzgx4&feature=related What about clouds? And life? Dave Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
