Comment: That's looking from the inside of MoQ, and of course it would be right from that perspective, as MOQ only considers experience. If Ham, like me, is trying to consider MoQ in a wider context, as just one concept among many other concepts, the argument becomes invalid. But it's true that MoQ just considers experience and that the source then, of experience, would be experience itself and thus being self-sufficient. Inside the MoQ, the question concerning an external course would be invalid in the same way as the statement "This statement is false" would be invalid in formal logic.
/A -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andre Broersen Sent: den 26 oktober 2010 13:32 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [MD] The Dynamics of Value Once you have invented such 'source', the question starts again; what is the source of the source (etc etc)? And what you'll end up with is yourself. Have you ever considered that perhaps there is no such thing as 'complete' ontology? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
