On Oct. 29 at 2:01PM, Andre Broersen wrote:
What you are saying here Ham are (literally) intellectual observations after the event. I still tend to think that you want the positing of an independent observer, an independent object and the 'something' that 'happens' between the two without any 'primary' connection.
No, Andre, you read me incorrectly. I assume that "the event" refers to experience. If so, our cognizance of events (observation) represents our intellectual interpretation of experience. (The time sequence is of no importance.)
The "independent observer" is crucial for the realization of value and its objectification of otherness (physical reality). And value-sensibility holds these contingencies together as negated "essents". But while Value is our "primary connection" to Essence, it is the negation of Essence that actualizes the differential nature of finitude. Hence, negation is primary to difference (the Self/Other dichotomy), and individuated Sensibility is primary to the (space/time) appearance of finite existents.
Here's the bottom line: The ontology of Essentialism supports the theory that Absolute Essence is the "unmoved mover" which transcends the dynamics of negation.
I hope this clarifies your misconception. Essentially speaking, Ham Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
