On Oct 31, 2010, at 4:35 AM, Ham Priday wrote: > Ham: > Dan agrees that "'betterness' is relative," which means it is NOT an absolute > state of the universe, as some here insist. However, he denies that the > 'observer' has anything to do with it. In fact, he rejects the very notion > of an "independent observer" because, he says, "the 'self' is a fiction." > Like Marsha, he asks: "Where is the self? Point to it." >
Greetings Ham, I'd like to restate my position. In my understanding, the self is NOT an independent, inherently existing being who is the center of control. The individual is a flow of patterns. One's participation happens through awareness. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
