On Nov 13, 2010, at 3:02 PM, david buchanan wrote:

> 
> dmb says:
> Exactly. We're supposed to be persuaded by the arguments and the evidence and 
> this is CONTRASTED with arguments from authority. Arguments from authority 
> are based on the assumption that "Thee Truth" is the sole property of some 
> thing or other. If you believe the bible is the written word of God, for 
> example, there is no way to argue against that no matter what the evidence is.



dmb,

You have yet to produce a persuasive argument.   Your tactic is more to present 
a quote and ask the person to 'think about it,' or  write "you should be able 
to see that for yourself."   I've not seen a persuasive argument or an 
explanation of what you present as evidence.   Have you had any classes in 
formal and informal logic?   
 

Marsha   

 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to