Hi Arlo, I understand what you are saying. I am fine to drop the questioning about theism. I do not believe an appropriate understanding was provided concerning the anti-theist suggestion, but not all debates have finality. If MOQ is anti-theist as Pirsig considers I don't need to pursue the why, I can move on. I don't think that stance has any effect on the MOQ.
I'm not sure if any of my questions or reasons made sense to you, perhaps not. I am interested in what dmb has to say in amplification, not what Pirsig writes. I have not had the opportunity to discuss with RMP, but I would probably ask him the same questions. As such, we are left with second-hand interpretations of MOQ. I do find authority of any kind threatening as you know. I am not much one for towing the party line without knowing why. This is my problem. Thanks for the post. Mark > > [Arlo] > I think more perverse is the notion that every post should reinvent the > wheel. > As for the MOQ *and* philosophy, DMB demonstrates a far greater depth of > understanding and contextual knowledge than I've seen most anyone else here > contribute. Is it this authority that threatens you? > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
