On Nov 13, 2010, at 7:46 PM, 118 wrote: > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:20 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> dmb, >> >> You have yet to produce a persuasive argument. Your tactic is more to >> present a quote and ask the person to 'think about it,' or write "you >> should be able to see that for yourself." I've not seen a persuasive >> argument or an explanation of what you present as evidence. Have you had >> any classes in formal and informal logic? >> >> >> Marsha >> >> Hi Marsha, >> > I have got used to it. dmb has no interest in discussing MOQ with any that > have views other than his own. He can quote Pirsig all he wants, it is > meaningless to this discussion. Zooming around the internet and cutting and > pasting, that passes for thought these days. These kids have a superficial > notion of things and it is the internet which has done that. No more > thinking needed, others on Wiki can speak for them. Take his posts with a > grain of salt. It is distracting and does not progress the MOQ. There are > others that have meaningful things to post. The old guard is stuck, no more > gumption, stuck. At least Dan seems to have dropped out. Maybe dmb will > get tired of my questions. > > Have fun! > Mark
Hi Mark, Have fun? Oh, I suppose because I rarely use smiley or winky faces, you do not get the sense of my laughter. It is what it is. ;-) Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
