On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:51 PM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR <[email protected]>wrote:
> [Mark] > If MOQ is anti-theist as Pirsig considers I don't need to pursue the why, I > can > move on. I don't think that stance has any effect on the MOQ. > > [Arlo] > I re-read this a few times, because something wasn't gelling for me, and I > realized its the "the" at the end. And this kinda gets back to my > conversation > with Bo about "a MOQ" versus "the MOQ". > > In the former, we are talking about ideas that different people have and we > can > discuss the relative merits of those beliefs. In the second, we are trapped > in > a dialogue about "who is right about *the* MOQ". Does this make sense? > > [Mark in response] Yes, this makes sense. The MOQ does not sound right. I like to think of it more in terms of growth. Hopefully agreement has a place there. As I reread my own sentence I would perhaps say, "on the outcome of MOQ in a general sense". This also has its problems since it is anticipating something which I cannot box in at this time. So, your comment was well received, mine was somewhat poorly expressed. Thanks, Mark > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
