Hi John,
On Nov 29, 2010, at 12:26 PM, John Carl wrote: > Hi Marsha, > > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:33 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Hi John, >> >> Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought you meant language as in 'words' or >> the English language. >> > No apology necessary, Marsha. After all, that is the normal understanding > of "language". But I'm thinking of stuff like, computer language after its > been compiled - machine language its called It's not comprehensible to > humans but still is a language. I've worked with Assembly language when I first started in 1974. You're suggesting the computer analogy. > Likewise, DNA is codified information such > that it could be called its own language. In this sense of "language", it's > the anti-entropic, linguistic flip that signifies the DQ turn and once it's > going, it just keeps building up analogy upon analogy infinitely. And in Descartes' day, the clockwork analogy was used. > Biocentrism postulates that time and space are conceptually constructed by > animal consciousness. I'd say then what is meant by "constructed", is the > narrative order imposed by this kind of "language". > > Language is Quality. According to the MoQ, it's all Quality. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
