Hi Mark, I'm not sure I can FULLY comprehend anything, let alone consciousness. I can watch bits and pieces of pattern pass through, and that demonstrates what they are not.
Marsha On Dec 5, 2010, at 1:48 PM, 118 wrote: > Hi Marsha, > > Yes, but the notion of levels is very easy to come to. How is it that > we can create a single consciousness with this body that is made up of > lots of stuff? It is quite possible that a consciousness exists at > the social level that we can never fully understand, just like the > cells of our body are not aware of our human consciousness. > > Mark > > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:02 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Mark, >> >> The whole area is interesting to me. The level structure is, to my >> mind, an intellectual pattern. How would a level outside the >> existing structure emerge? It makes me dizzy, like trying to >> explain watching patterns flow through consciousness or having >> an unpatterned experience. If a new level would play by >> different rules, then ???. I have more questions than answers. >> >> >> Marsha >> >> >> >> >> >> On Dec 4, 2010, at 7:36 PM, 118 wrote: >> >>> Hi Marsha, >>> I am fine with your description or analogy. My question was more >>> directed to what is required to create a new level, in general. We >>> have divided up the expression of Quality into several levels. What >>> creates the difference? >>> >>> We can certainly consider this a static value at this point, since we >>> are discussing a concept. Of course the static value can change >>> dynamically. And I don't want to get into that right now. >>> >>> That is the way I would pose the question. You may have had a >>> different idea with your starting this post. I can always change how >>> I respond. >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 1:28 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Dec 4, 2010, at 12:15 AM, 118 wrote: >>>> >>>>> A better question would be: What is similar between all the divisions >>>>> in levels? What is the specific criteria which divides them, not each >>>>> one, but in general? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Mark, >>>> >>>> This would be an interesting topic. I always thought that what can be >>>> said of all patterns across all levels is that they are ever-changing, >>>> impermanent, interdependent, and conceptually constructed. What >>>> do you think? >>>> >>>> >>>> Marsha >> >> >> >> >> ___ ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
