> On Dec 7, 2010, at 3:25 PM, MarshaV wrote: > >> >> On Dec 7, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Arlo Bensinger wrote: >> >>> [Arlo had asked] >>> Just out of curiosity, do you think there are such things as "unreified >>> concepts"? >>> >>> [Marsha] >>> I am not opposed to reification; it's a very useful intellectual tool. >>> >>> [Arlo] >>> If you answered the above question, I missed it. Do you think there >>> are "unreified concepts"? And if not, why not just say "concepts"? >> >> >> Marsha: >> Not "unreified' intellectual static (concepts) patterns of value. >> > > [Arlo] > So if you think all concepts are reified, why do you say "reified concepts"? > Why not just say "concepts"? > > Do you think Pirsig's ideas, "the MOQ", are concepts? >
Marsha: You seem to have misrepresented my statement and reframed the issue. I think you are more interested in scoring a point than an explanation, a discussion or any type of understanding, so this conversation is over. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
