On Dec 18, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Andre Broersen wrote:

> Marsha responding to Tim by referring to Marsha and dmb's interaction (phew!):
> 
> DQ is sq, sq is DQ.  Most of us know this, but it sounds like
> Matt and Steve do not care to focus on a separate DQ experience.
> 
> Andre:
> To keep on confusing, or rather suggesting that 'DQ is sq' is completely 
> uprooting any kind of meaningful conversation Marsha, and certainly when 
> talking about a static intellectual pattern of value called 'MOQ'.

Meaningful conversation?  Isn't it you, Andre, who like to talk of snotbuckets. 
 



 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to