Marsha, okay.
I still want to ask if 'illusion' is a linguistic rule?, and if, thus, it would be acceptable for my unpatterned experience to result in the denial that reality and a controlling 'I' are mere illusion?, because the idea that it is all process and illusion seems supremely *inhibiting* to me; but this may appear as sophistry too. I have been accused of being a 'bully' in discussions - I think this is because 'bullying' is what I do to myself; it is high quality for me to bully my mind. I would be happy to hear about your experience, perhaps if you denote when you would like me to be bully-free ... Anyway, I'm still here. All the best, Tim On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 04:12:54 -0500, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> said: > > > Greetings Tim, > > I see the unpatterned as experience removed from the restrictions > of linguistic rules. I might sometimes want to try to tell you about the > experience, but at the moment I do not want to share with someone > so linguistically sophisticated. I find it much to inhibiting. > > > Marsha > > > -- [email protected] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
