Not really. I think it has something to do with assimilating
"knowing-that" to "verbal abstractions" and than not conceiving of
them as every bit of an outgrowth of DQ-direct-experience as an
arm or sunset.
> Hi Matt,
>
> Can you tell me what dmb's objection is?
>
> Marsha
>
> On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Matt Kundert wrote:
>
> >
> > Absolutely. In Brandom's systematic expansion of the core ideas of
> > Sellars and Rorty, propositional knowing-that is built out of
> > pragmatic know-how.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >> Hi Matt,
> >>
> >> It sounds to me like Rorty is saying it is verbal designation all the
> >> all the way down, but isn't that be verbal designation built on
> >> regularity and explanatory usefulness, as in pragmatically?
> >>
> >>
> >> Marsha
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
