Hi Matt, Your Pirsig Affliction posts were excellent. I had no justification for mentioning that obscure and convoluted Margolis book. These threads, though, remind me again of the Lila soliloquy but with an East/West twist rather than gender. The West tends to be philosophically playing around the edges, and won't go to the center, like say Nagarjuna...
Beautiful papers! Marsha On Dec 22, 2010, at 4:07 AM, MarshaV wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > From where i sit now, I'm back to "It’s worth noting that the MOQ follows a > pragmatic notion of truth so truth is seen as relative in his system while > Quality is seen as absolute. In consequence, the truth is defined as the > highest quality intellectual explanation at a given time." That's relative, > not random. I'll give your papers a try. But I must say something about > style. A while back I read a half-dozen books on relativism. The majority > were well written and helpful. Margolis was the only author whose style > seemed affected; I thought maybe he wrote with his head up is butt. > > > Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
