Hi Magnus, OK, "tactic" maybe has manipulative implications for you. Your "deliberate and legitimate intention" was to ask unanswerable questions (in the context).
Ian On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Dan Glover <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello everyone > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Ian Glendinning > <[email protected]> wrote: >> OK, Marsha, Dan, Horse, >> >> Dan, yep, I saw your tactic. > > Hi Ian > > I had no tactic, per se. My questions were legitimate, just not > answerable in the traditional sense. Thus they made no sense, as > Marsha observed. > > The "why metaphysics" question was not directed towards the discussion > in general but rather towards Marsha's definition of self. The MOQ > definition of self is laid out in LILA and other subsequent writings > so there is no need to rehash it here, so far as I can see. > > But still, if a person needs to ask "why metaphysics" in a discussion > group dedicated to the Metaphysics of Quality, what are they doing > here in the first place? I thought that went without saying: We're all > degenerates. Period. > > Dan > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
