Hi Tim, On Jan 5, 2011, at 3:04 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> Marsha, > >> >> >> Marsha: >> I am a collection of ever-changing, interdependent, inorganic, >> biological, social and intellectual static patterns of value entangled >> within a field of DQ. >> >> > > [Tim] > Marsha, I like the update to 'entangled within a...", but I think that > 'field' might bring in associations that you don't intend (EM field...). Marsha: John is responsible for the 'entanglement' update. I don't know EM field. I've used the term 'field' before but more in relation to quantum field. It seemed to fit well with the word 'entanglement.' Field as an ontological framework. > Perhaps you might prefer to consider something along the lines of > 'forum' even, or 'arena', or just 'entangled within DQ'. Marsha: Maybe 'entangled within DQ' would be better, but I like the connection with QM. I see the MoQ and quantum physics confronting the same issues. > Question 1: are you / can you be, aware of anything that is not included > in this 'collection'? Marsha: Aware? My answer is no. There may very well be all sorts of unrecognized patterns included in the collection but outside awareness means outside awareness. That would be an excellent reason, though to cultivate a more subtle awareness. > Well, I have just decided that I will leave it at this for now. Perhaps > I have another question or two to follow. > > Tim > -- ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
