Andre, much thanks! I think you understand this quite a bit better than I do at this point! It seems brilliant! I will continue to ponder it a bit (on and off, carefree-like).
Tim On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:17:01 +0100, "Andre Broersen" <[email protected]> said: > Tim to Andre: > > You are probably right about it being impossible to fully understand > Quality! > > Andre: > Come to think of it Tim, I am certain. I think what we are discussing > here is Pirsig's metaphysics of... > > Given that Quality is a pre-intellectual event, a metaphysics thereof can > only be a finger pointing to ... and nothing else. Any metaphysical > construction of Quality can only approximate it by saying what it is not > rather than what it is. It cannot be 'captured' or understood > intellectually. We (only) have the static 'fingers' of value. > > That is why it is important to keep DQ and sq separate, to not mix them > up or confuse them. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html -- [email protected] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
