I'd agree with that Craig, Predictably though, most (not necessarily all) of those are things we'd (probably) agree we need in balance, patterns that have value, but which we wouldn't want to be dominant "objects" .... that discussion of how much of these things (and probably more examples) provides optimal value, would be the essence of a good debate IMHO.
Ian On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:33 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps a good way for the MoQ to approach an intellectually-guided > economy, is to list characteristics that we do/don't want: > consumer choice > competition > profit > money > greed > copyrights/patents/trademarks > contracts > private property > advertising > free markets > taxes > tariffs > torts > charity > Then consider how we would support/require/prohibit/allow these. > IMHO just railing about economic "systems" seems unproductive. > Craig > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
