right Mark. The point I hoped I made with Craig was that the fact we cannot logically conclude the universe is good, (and yet it is) does not point to a problem with the universe - or the good - but points to a problem with our faculty of logical concluding - our intellect. This is the roots of our "incompleteness".
Something that many people have been saying in differing ways and I just thought I'd throw my own simplistically formulated hat in the ring. However, having done so, I'm all about complicating my simplification by saying that while intellect alone is inadequate to conclude that the universe is good (Quality=Experience=Reality), the synthesis of the romantic and the classic IS sufficient to indisputably make this conclusion. That's what my heart tells, me. That it takes TWO, to tango. But I'm picking up that thread elsewhere - Marsha's thread. Take care, John PS: I completely agree - "the term irrational is not appropriate" and I thank you for making that point. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
