Mark, Part of my fascination lies in your direction - brain structure. The bifurcated, two-way brain IS how we think. My hypothesis is that this dichotomy is necessary so that self-knowledge is possible - without "another way of looking at things", we wouldn't be able to be aware that there is another way of looking at things.
How fun would that be? Not very. John [Mark] > I will have to think about the relationship between good and the > romantic/classic analogy. For me it may lie in my approach to things. > > I find that the dichotomy disappears if both are approached in a Zen > way (for lack of a better term). That is, we do not create an > objective sense of what we are doing, but become part of what our > efforts are directed twoards. This is easier to do with music than > motorcycle maintenance, the question is why? There are those who say > that thinking somehow separates us from the "real" world. I would > have to say, that thinking is part of the real world, and that the > proposed separation is what causes the confusion. Somehow man-made is > no longer natural. > > Things are certainly easier to understand and deal with when we create > two. One just leaves us with, well...., one. How fun is that? > > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
