On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:05 AM, John Carl <[email protected]> wrote:
> > However, having done so, I'm all about complicating my simplification by > saying that while intellect alone is inadequate to conclude that the > universe is good (Quality=Experience=Reality), the synthesis of the romantic > and the classic IS sufficient to indisputably make this conclusion. That's > what my heart tells, me. That it takes TWO, to tango. [Mark] I will have to think about the relationship between good and the romantic/classic analogy. For me it may lie in my approach to things. I find that the dichotomy disappears if both are approached in a Zen way (for lack of a better term). That is, we do not create an objective sense of what we are doing, but become part of what our efforts are directed twoards. This is easier to do with music than motorcycle maintenance, the question is why? There are those who say that thinking somehow separates us from the "real" world. I would have to say, that thinking is part of the real world, and that the proposed separation is what causes the confusion. Somehow man-made is no longer natural. Things are certainly easier to understand and deal with when we create two. One just leaves us with, well...., one. How fun is that? Cheers, Mark > > But I'm picking up that thread elsewhere - Marsha's thread. > > Take care, > > John > > > PS: I completely agree - "the term irrational is not appropriate" and I > thank you for making that point. > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
