<snip> It would be tempting to state that the cause of all change or evolution is Dynamic Quality. However to say that makes the concept of Dynamic Quality meaningless in a metaphysical sense, because it simply creates a word for "effecting all change". Evolution can simply mean the stepwise change of things that we can only see in hindsight. If that is the definition, then let's just talk about the history of the world. So, I ask the group, What do you mean by "Evolution"?
I just seems to me that we are using the word Evolution as a catch phrase for something that it is not. It may seem like it relates to the sciences, but it most certainly does not. The term provides practical awareness in biology, but I do not see it in MoQ. Cheers, Mark Hi Mark and all, I see evolution as levels in existence. In a DQ/SQ (undefined/defined) metaphysics existence is undefined in levels, DQ. For myself I see seven levels in existence. I twisted and turned in the wind struggling to understand how could I know the undefined? I distinguish love from hate. The level of indefinable emotions gives a connection to the indefinable. DQ/SQ. Emotions are DQ only. What level of evolution embodies perception? The emotional level! Pirsig proposes four levels in evolutionary existence. I see seven levels in existence DQ, using the musical scale Do, Re, Mi_Fa, Sol, La, Ti_ as repeating levels in intensity-- metaphysics. Joe On 3/26/11 1:42 PM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: > It would be tempting to state that the cause of all change or > evolution is Dynamic Quality. However to say that makes the concept > of Dynamic Quality meaningless in a metaphysical sense, because it > simply creates a word for "effecting all change". Evolution can > simply mean the stepwise change of things that we can only see in > hindsight. If that is the definition, then let's just talk about the > history of the world. So, I ask the group, What do you mean by > "Evolution"? > > I just seems to me that we are using the word Evolution as a catch > phrase for something that it is not. It may seem like it relates to > the sciences, but it most certainly does not. The term provides > practical awareness in biology, but I do not see it in MoQ. > > Cheers, > Mark Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
