[Marsha]
Right,,, put into quotes for aesthetic reasons? Not for misrepresenting the idea as mine. ???

[Arlo]
I knew you were not asking for clarification as much as you were seeking some way to foist a paranoiac accusation of malicious intent. Lacking any real substantive or argumentative point, I expected this.

So I bit, took it at face value that I should clarify something as pedantic as syntax for you, but of course your game was simply more evasion and distraction (well done, too, I bet no one even noticed that you shifted the topic from interpretation and interpretative legitimacy into paranoid complaints about "misquoting"... (I used quotes there cautiously, I hope your confusion about quotes is somewhat cleared)).

I'll assume from this point forward your non-substantive replies will all be along the same vein. If you have something substantive to say, by all means, do, otherwise be my guest at all the paranoid evasions you want, I won't bother to reply to them any longer. Its clear to me its all you really have to offer in response to my points. The floor is all yours.

Oh, by the way, if you really don't understand the use of quotes, the typeset use of scare quotes, the ugliness of a unclosed single quote string, or the reasons why formatting and singular quotes are problematic in emails, then there are ample web resources that will help you out with that.


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to