On Mar 31, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Arlo Bensinger wrote: > [Arlo's rhetoric] > > This is the sort of head-in-sand nonsense that pretty much demonstrates my > point about "interpretative legitimacy". I have never had any problem > disagreeing with Pirsig, and when I do I am vocal and clear about it. Its a > nice attempt at evasion, but it doesn't hold water. > > Why is it, oddly, that the very people who champion "interpretative > legitimacy" tend to be the same ones who are happy Pirsig is no longer > involved in the dialogue? Every time in the past I have said that, yes, I > agree that more dialogue with Pirsig would be a good thing, its the people > who mostly share your interpretation that think his involvement in discussing > his own ideas would be a bad thing. > > In any event, the idea that "it's all interpretation" is absurd.
Marsha asks: Do you have a source for ther quote "it's all interpretation"? I never made such a statement. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
