Hi Jan-Anders, I'm not sure I understand your response to my writing. Do you think you can write about it some more? I have put my comments below for what of it I've understood regardless..
> I don't think there is a possible ultimate maximum freedom waiting around the > corner somewhere. I'm not sure what you mean by around the corner however I do think there is a 'true' freedom and what Dan has termed a 'conventional' freedom. One of those is DQ, the other is just more static quality. Doing some thing else to get away from some thing is static quality. Getting some thing perfect kills static quality and reveals the Dynamic Quality that's there all along. > I think the best we can do is to find the freedom that we have already, > between the static pattern of ours which is the definition of our own > original existence on earth. Are you saying freedom is to be found 'between' static patterns? What do you mean by this? > At the beginning of the big bang, when no static pattern was created, there > was a universal state of total dynamic freedom and all there was was DQ. But > who wants to start over again? I disagree. Before the inorganic patterns existed there was chaos. It is quality which holds these patterns together. Albeit a low quality from an MOQ perspective but a quality none the less. > I am happy with the relative dynamic freedom I can find between the > measurable moments of static values. There is always a way out somewhere. > Without walls there would be no room. Again, I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Are you suggesting there is Dynamic Quality between static quality? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
