Hi Mark,

On May 11, 2011, at 3:59 PM, 118 wrote:

> Mark:
> What you say below is incorrect.  You are speaking of the Social
> Level.  We think outside of language and only use it for
> communication.  

Marsha:
I am speaking about thinking, not consciousness.  I am sure human 
beings are conscious of many experiences outside of language: smell,
taste, hearing, touch and sight to name the most obvious.    


> Mark:
> Many things are true to the individual; things are
> only agreed on at the Social level.

Marsha:
I understand thinking to go on at both the Social and Intellectual 
Levels.  





> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:51 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hello Arlo,
>> 
>> Been thinking that we can think and characterize reality only subject to 
>> language, which is conventional (sq) and says nothing ultimately true.  Do 
>> you accept your last statement  (Assimilating language...) as true?
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On May 10, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Arlo Bensinger wrote:
>> 
>>> [Marsha]
>>> Is this about an autonomous individual?
>>> 
>>> [Arlo]
>>> No. In this paragraph the author is stating the extremes, or poles, of 
>>> "structure" (determinism?) and "agency" (free will?). There have been other 
>>> terms for these, but within structuration theories (such as Giddens, 
>>> Archer, Parker and Bourdieu), these are recast not as antagonist forces, 
>>> but mutually enabling and mutually supportive. Agency is always enacted 
>>> within structure, and structure is always influenced by agency. Greater 
>>> structure brings greater agency, simplistically, rather than being 
>>> inversely related. The incredibly rapidity of world travel, and the ensuing 
>>> "freedom" to move around the globe, rests on a very complex structure of 
>>> mechanics, navigation, flight theory, schedules, airports, etc etc etc. If 
>>> you remove the structure, the agency of  the individual to move around is 
>>> severely diminished. Moreso, Boudieu also considers the same duality 
>>> regarding "words" which Mark seems to suggest is a form of imprisonment. 
>>> Assimilating language provides us with far gre
 at
>>  er capacity to act than a feral human would have, albeit it at the same 
>> time (like roadways) channeling our thoughts in certain ways.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to