On May 12, 2011, at 3:38 AM, Andre Broersen wrote: > Marsha previously to Arlo: > > Bo and Platt leave and everybody forgets that SOM has a major flaw. > > Marsha to Andre: > I did not mention the Intellectual level, so blah, blah away... > > Andre: > You mentioned SOM. Let me spell it out for you; it stands for Subject/Object > Metaphysics. A metaphysics is an intellectual pattern of value. You mentioned > Bo and Platt, both advocates of the intellectual level being SOM. You > mentioned 'major flaw'. Put them together and I may, with all reasonableness > presume you are referring to the intellectual level.
Marsha: Put it together any way you wish, but I did not mention the Intellectual Level. What you count are reasonable presumption is your own projection and is not a universal truth. > It appears to me that you really have a problem with the use and role of > language here, and you state this in your posts to Arlo and dmb. Language is > supposed to be a means of conveying meaning. You appear not to do this. You > cannot 'read between the lines' and every response to you by anyone here who > does this,i.e. trying to find out and respond to what you MEAN meets with > slippery denial since, as you say: "I did not mention..." this or that or the > other... literally i.e by using the exact same word(s)you used. > Well, keep on writing yourself posts Marsha because this approach is > frustrating, unreasonable and at times outright dishonest. This is supposed > to be a discussion forum, not a shoot and duck nor point scoring contest. Marsha: What appears to you is a reflection of your static patterns. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
