It's straight from the heart...
On May 13, 2011, at 2:20 AM, MarshaV wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > I could continue: Static quality is Dynamic Quality. Dynamic Quality is > static quality. Static quality is not other than Dynamic Quality. Dynamic > Quality is not other than static quality. > > Is that too much to add? That is how I've seen it. That is my > experience/interpretation. Too Buddhist? > > > Marsha > > > > On May 12, 2011, at 10:01 PM, 118 wrote: > >> Hmmm Marsha, >> That's an awful lot of definitions. >> Mark >> >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:59 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On May 12, 2011, at 10:14 AM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote: >>> >>>> [Marsha] >>>> Ever-changing but within a stable, predictable pattern. >>>> >>>> [Arlo] >>>> Ever-changing (DQ) and giving rise to stable, predictable patterns (SQ). >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Marsha: >>> For me, Dynamic Quality is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable. >>> Static patterns of value are processes: impermanent, interdependent, >>> ever-changing. No subjects. No objects. Not things-in-themselves. >>> Overlapping, interconnected, ever-changing processes that pragmatically >>> tend to persist and change in a stable, predictable pattern. >>> ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
