On May 23, 2011, at 3:45 PM, 118 wrote:
> > [Mark] > Yes, I am aware of what you present. I didn't know it came from the > text book. My only point was that MoQ presents a division into DQ and > SQ for rhetorical purposes. Of course both are the same since both > are Quality. However, once we know that we move forward into the > explanation through a dichotomy. It doesn't make sense to me to point > towards the begining again since we already know what Quality is. > > I would say that Quality is the fundamental nature of sq, not DQ. > Otherwise the separation would not make much sense to me. > > Oh, is there an Oxford dvd too? > > The division of the rational and mystical is also provided as a > presentation. They do not really exist as you know. But yes, like Dq > and Sq they can be discussed as different. Hello Mark, I love that the fundamental nature of sq is DQ. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
