Hi Marsha, Yes, I have heard these pronouncements coming from you. I find them to be somewhat destructive of MoQ, and while they may seem expansive, they may not be.
Both sq and DQ are Quality, that does not logically mean that they are each other. The purpose for dividing Quality up is to provide meaning to the reader. Quality is divided into subunits for rhetorical reasons by MoQ. Such division is typical of metaphysics and helps promote the discussion. By definition, the two components are considered to be different attributes of Quality in the realm of discussion. This then leads the reader to further thinking and discussion. To short-circuit the division by equating the two does not provide much to the discussion. I have said that everything could be considered to be Cheese. This could be a line of discussion, but it provides very little meaning. Therefore, in the spirit of MoQ, we use these terms as different concepts. To say that they "is" each other is not a valid statement within MoQ, in my opinion. It is a synthesis that leads nowhere in terms of MoQ construction. Just my two cents. I have no problem with you making such statements, but I see no use in them in terms of MoQ. Cheers, Mark On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:20 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > I could continue: Static quality is Dynamic Quality. Dynamic Quality is > static quality. Static quality is not other than Dynamic Quality. Dynamic > Quality is not other than static quality. > > Is that too much to add? That is how I've seen it. That is my > experience/interpretation. Too Buddhist? > > > Marsha > > > > On May 12, 2011, at 10:01 PM, 118 wrote: > >> Hmmm Marsha, >> That's an awful lot of definitions. >> Mark >> >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:59 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On May 12, 2011, at 10:14 AM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote: >>> >>>> [Marsha] >>>> Ever-changing but within a stable, predictable pattern. >>>> >>>> [Arlo] >>>> Ever-changing (DQ) and giving rise to stable, predictable patterns (SQ). >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Marsha: >>> For me, Dynamic Quality is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable. >>> Static patterns of value are processes: impermanent, interdependent, >>> ever-changing. No subjects. No objects. Not things-in-themselves. >>> Overlapping, interconnected, ever-changing processes that pragmatically >>> tend to persist and change in a stable, predictable pattern. >>> >>> >>> ___ > > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
