Andre,
I can take your comments out of different posts and out of different context sand string them together and switch words in my response to you. - You're so clever, but I can do that too. Marsha On May 13, 2011, at 4:45 AM, Andre Broersen wrote: > Marsha to Dan: > > I do agree that language and patterns are useful for all sorts of reasons. > > If 'prison' is too strong a word for you, perhaps 'cage' would be a better > choice? I meant 'prison' > in the sense of 'constraint.' > > Marsha to Mark: > I could continue: Static quality is Dynamic Quality. Dynamic Quality is > static quality. Static quality is not other than Dynamic Quality. Dynamic > Quality is not other than static quality. > > Andre: > So the ineffable is 'cage', Pirsig's Quality is 'cage'. James' flux is > 'cage'. Northrop's 'undifferentiated aesthetic continuum' is 'cage'. Buddha's > 'Nothingness' is 'cage'. > > What a brilliant conclusion. As John asked of Paul (after Paul's 'Another > Day')'you must have learned something in all these years...?' and said: 'the > sound you make is musac to my ears'. > > You Marsha, are not even in sight of Madonna's 'Conventional Girl'. You > resemble more and more Phaedrus' description of Lila Blewitt. > ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
