Marsha said to Andre:
... Maybe you have a different interpretation; that's your problem. ... if you
would like to interpret things differently, be my guest. ...Whether you agree
with my statement or not is of little consequence ...If that is too much for
you to handle, too bad. ... If you cannot tolerate different opinions, too bad.
I'm here to explore the MoQ, and not to have a simpleton tell me in Cliff note
simplicity, with "milk and cookie" colloquialisms what to think.
dmb says:
Don't flatter yourself, Marsha. Nobody is criticizing your opinion because it's
"different" or because it's "too much to handle". What you always evade (like
an eel in a bucket of snot) are criticisms involving very basic conceptual
errors. I have criticized your misuse of terms, conflation of terms,
contradictory use of terms, your logical incoherence and your willingness to
ignore or otherwise contradict the textual evidence, for example. These basic
criticisms are about mishandling ideas, words and concepts. Having an unusual
point of view is not the same thing as having ham for hands.
Obviously, conflation, contradiction and incoherence would count as very low
quality stuff in any intellectual context. These standards are not fancy or
unusual in the least. These are just basic standards in high school. It's not
about being "different". It's about failing to make sense. It's about cloudy
vision and the failure to communicate.
So much so that you're probably sincerely incapable of understanding the nature
of these previous criticisms. It's a sure bet. The sun will come up tomorrow
and the point of this post will be lost on Marsha.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
