On 5/15/11 10:02 PM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip>
> [Mark]
> Yes, you are not the only one, which means that I am not presenting it
> in the most understandable way. Something that is perfect is
> something that is not lacking. Nothing can be added or detracted from
> the moment. There is no comparison possible in the moment, such as
> "this moment could be better or more perfect". Each moment is uniques
> as it unfolds. Perfection only becomes an issue when we compare pasts
> or futures. It is hard to describe fully, and I can only present how
> I experience it. There is no future, there is no past, there are no
> comparisons. The moment does not have time since it is too small an
> interval for that. Sometimes it can be very strange to be in the
> moment and be thinking about being in the moment. Often this breaks
> the spell. So instead of an intellectual explanation (to myself) I
> consider it as feelings. One such feeling is an intense one of
> relief. There is also joy, and loss of any worries, like things are
> just right. I will leave it at that since this is a tangent.
>>
<snip>
Hi Mark and all,
In trying to explicate a DQ/SQ metaphysics, DQ remains indefinable, yet
knowable. I think you are on the right track with "feelings" as indefinable
DQ. I do not see DQ as a tangent to SQ. Without DQ, evolution is not
discernible. The intellectual level is SQ logic, along with definable SQ
material, Organic 1 life reproducing by cell division, organic 2 life
instinct reproducing by the penetration of an egg cell by a sperm cell.
Emotion is DQ only along with a higher emotion and higher intellect
manifested by heroes.
Imho Joe.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
