On 5/30/11 3:39 PM, "Ham Priday" <[email protected]> wrote: <snip> > Your conception is fine, Mark, and I'm in complete agreement with the first > two sentences. But you don't need that three-legged stool. Most of REALITY > is nothingness to us, and the "free agent" is a nothingness to Reality. But > since all nothingness is a negation of Essence, "the world" seen by the > "agent" is only "appeariential" (i.e., non-real). At best self/other > existence is a "mode" of Essence, but Oneness prevails -- even in plurality. <snip> Hi Ham and all, I am very rusty on all this, but it seems to me that force can be analysed in three ways, Active, Passive, Neutral. Joe Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value Joseph Maurer
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value 118
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value Joseph Maurer
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value Joseph Maurer
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value Ham Priday
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value X Acto
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value Ham Priday
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value Joseph Maurer
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value 118
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value Ham Priday
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value Joseph Maurer
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value X Acto
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value Ham Priday
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value X Acto
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value 118
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value Ham Priday
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value 118
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value X Acto
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value Ham Priday
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value Joseph Maurer
- Re: [MD] The other side of Value X Acto
