On 5/24/11 9:25 PM, "Ham Priday" <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip>
> I can understand why metaphysical prepositions are sometimes regarded as
> illogical. But I find it incredulous that an intelligent person such as
> yourself can be persuaded that an "emotional level" defines unity. It makes
> me wonder what you would make of epistemology.
<snip>
Hi Ham and All,
I keep returning to your post with questions. What defines unity? It is
something in consciousness, since it is other. The emotional level is
indefinable. Where does the 1 at an intellectual level obtain validity for
the base to mathematics?
My conclusion was from the indefinable emotional level. You call that an
incredulous statement. I find no hesitation in saying that 1 at an
emotional level is an indefinable metaphysical reality of identity, while 1
at an intellectual level is defined and followed by 2.
Joe
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
