On 6/1/11 9:33 PM, "Ham Priday" <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip>
> For one thing, we don't "directly experience Quality independent of
> intellectual abstractions." Quality is an assessment of the aesthetic or
> moral value of a phenomenon relative to other phenomena experienced or
> observed. That involves memory recall, intellectual judgment, and
> sufficient experience with the type of phenomenon in question to make such
> an assessment. (And please don't quote me the hot stove analogy again.
> Getting one's ass burned is not experiencing Quality--high or low, positive
> or negative--it's feeling pain.)
<snip>
Hi Ham and all,
"Instinctive", "moving", "existing" seem to be coupled to a direct
experience of "Quality" so much so that we can express a Yes! or No! To the
experience.
Joe
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
