Ham said:
James is hailed for his pragmatism which stemmed largely from his practice in
psychology. The pragmatists of the last two centuries have been scientists
(objectivists). Their goal is to explore the physical world for empirical
knowledge and principles that can be applied to solving problems and inventing
new things. They have no professional interest in aesthetics, morality, human
values, or a transcendent reality. Indeed, such subjective concepts are only
distractions to the experimental method.
dmb says:
None of that is true. Pragmatism as such was invented about a hundred ago,
partly as a reaction against positivistic science. Pragmatism is a kind of
Humanism and James presented as a moderator between two great rival schools of
philosophy, the rationalists and the empiricists, both of which he found
lacking for various reasons. James more or less single-handedly invented the
psychology of religion and his "Varieties of Religious Experience" is almost
entirely comprise of descriptions of so-called subject experience. I mean, Ham,
you have just made a series of profoundly ignorant statements, none of which
are even close to being correct.
Ham said:
...I think the category that best fits him is "pragmatic idealist", for he is
more interested in anthropology and societal development than in metaphysics.
His ontological paradigm is an evolutionary hierarchy of Quality levels that
govern the universe, including mankind (when individuals are fortunate enough
to "latch onto" the higher levels.) There is no Creator in this existential
scheme (Quality is utimately self-created), no teleology except for the
'betterness" toward which the universe automatically moves, and no need for a
free agent, since the universe is assumed to be inherently moral. In short,
this "empirical reality" which you tout as "the guide to future experience" is
no more than interacting patterns of quality carried along in the stream of
evolution.
dmb says:
There is no free agent because the universe automatically moves? No, Ham.
You're still not getting it. Man is the measure of all things, Man is a
participant in the creation of all things. We invented the universe and the
gods, the earth and sky. These are concepts we've carved out of experience, in
response to experience. Those concepts either agree with experience or they
don't. And if they don't, then you've got to get a new set of concepts. Ideas
are mutable and secondary.
Oh, never mind. You don't really care, do you?
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
