Mark, You are posting on a site that accepts a DQ/SQ formulation for reality. It's alright to say that the MOQ is nonsensical, to provoke a further discussion of QUALITY, but your metaphysics seems to be based on mathematical logic, which places the value of Love on a balance scale. You are hamstrung by mathematics in describing reality as its logic does not admit evolution, but only a lack of order in describing different individuals.
Joe On 6/6/11 4:28 PM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Joe, > To define something as undefinable is a bit nonsensical. Perhaps you mean to > use the word "ineffable". > > Just asking. > > Mark > > On Jun 5, 2011, at 8:15 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 6/5/11 10:51 AM, "Ham Priday" <[email protected]> wrote: >> <snip> >>> The novel 'in process' for each of us is our own life-experience. Only when >>> it is completed can we determine our essential value-complement. And that >>> is metaphysically significant because it's what we "take with us" from this >>> dimensional existence. >>> >>> At least, that's my belief. >> <snip> >> >> >> This may be true in a SO metaphysics, but in a DQ/SQ metaphysics there is >> something indefinable. >> >> Joe >> >> >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
