On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Mark, > > You are posting on a site that accepts a DQ/SQ formulation for reality. > It's alright to say that the MOQ is nonsensical, to provoke a further > discussion of QUALITY, but your metaphysics seems to be based on > mathematical logic, which places the value of Love on a balance scale. You > are hamstrung by mathematics in describing reality as its logic does not > admit evolution, but only a lack of order in describing different > individuals. > > Joe
Hi Joe, I have not said that MoQ is nonsensical. In fact it makes a lot of sense to me. If I use Ham's presentation of love as attraction, there is no balance. I am also far from mathematical logic, you have me confused for Ron there. You yourself have stated that evolution is the presentation of levels. That sounds like a logical argument to me. You seem to be the one admitting evolution through logic. Never have you stated before that evolution describes individuals, only that it presents levels. I am curious, how does this work? Are some individuals higher in evolution than others? Are they on a different level? If so, this is a new argument from you and I will have to think about it. Just be clear, I do not think that MoQ is nonsensical. Your presentation of it does not make much sense to me, however. Cheers, Mark > > On 6/6/11 4:28 PM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Joe, >> To define something as undefinable is a bit nonsensical. Perhaps you mean to >> use the word "ineffable". >> >> Just asking. >> >> Mark >> >> On Jun 5, 2011, at 8:15 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 6/5/11 10:51 AM, "Ham Priday" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> <snip> >>>> The novel 'in process' for each of us is our own life-experience. Only >>>> when >>>> it is completed can we determine our essential value-complement. And that >>>> is metaphysically significant because it's what we "take with us" from this >>>> dimensional existence. >>>> >>>> At least, that's my belief. >>> <snip> >>> >>> >>> This may be true in a SO metaphysics, but in a DQ/SQ metaphysics there is >>> something indefinable. >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>> Archives: >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
