On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 6/8/11 4:43 PM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Joe, >> The dynamic does not manifest, it IS. > > Hi Mark, > > I suppose there can be an unmanifest dynamic, but then how would I know? >> >> Words are useless in terms of the dynamic as you have correctly pointed out. >> >> If you take away words and the sense of other, you are left with DQ. This is >> where we live most of the time. It is only in a societal function that we >> live in sq. >> >> Mark > > I don't agree with your view of view DQ. I prefer to leave it indefinable! > In that way I don't have to compare it to words. I'm not clear on what you > mean by a 'societal function'. >
[Mark] I called it ineffable since there are not enough words to describe it. Undefinable means something else to me, and is itself a definfition (like ineffable). I do not like defining something as undefinable. In terms of the societal level, I am making use of the different levels in MoQ to explain much of our reality. Without the societal level, we do not have a concept of self. This is because we cannot compare ourselves to another. Words are used by the societal level to package thought in incomplete utterances which are then received by the listener. This is a form of static quality. Outside of the societal level, we live in dynamic quality. Mark > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
