Two truths. Guess you'll stick to the one requiring a regress of proofs into infinity.
On Jun 14, 2011, at 8:06 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson wrote: > Sure, a series of events, not this and not that, but what it is? > > Just as we can prove the existence of something by relating it to another > object or to itself as changing in time. In the same way we can prove that a > series of events exists by studying these events in relation to other events > like dmb or the X Acto series of events. Relations that can be observed and > declared as positively existing as they're making a new serie of events. > > But does it have Quality? For better or worse. > > Have a new dice > > J-A > > > 14 jun 2011 kl. 13.40 Marsha wrote: > >> J-A, >> >> Marsha is a series of events, not an autonomous little homunculus >> trying to get a promotion. >> >> Marsha >> >> On Jun 14, 2011, at 4:25 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson wrote: >>> >>> We all know that Marshas next contribution is not predictable and therefore >>> dynamic but does she also got a sense of humour? >>> >>> Have a nice die >>> >>> J-A >>> >> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
